Who we are
We are not adapting a general trucking practice to new regulation. The practice was created because of the regulation.
01
Reading the new federal framework line by line against live carrier and brokerage files, one pattern repeated: obligations were restated without being defined. Operators kept documenting to the old standard because no new one had been articulated. Nobody was covering the difference.
02
Litigation was going to arrive at those seams before the agencies clarified them. Counsel would need someone who could testify to a standard of care in the absence of precedent, and operators would need someone to close the exposure before a claim forced the question.
03
The objective is not case volume. It is to publish, teach, and testify consistently enough that the analytical framework used here becomes the reference the industry and the courts adopt.
Mission
A standard of care does not appear the day a rule is published. It is built by the operators who document thoughtfully, the counsel who argue carefully, and the experts who explain both to a court.
This practice takes a position on what reasonable looks like in the interim, states it in writing, and defends it under cross-examination. That consistency is the product.
Read the expert's professional background